Americans Have Lost Their Medical Advocates
Segment #251
Over the past few years we have learned that we no longer have institutional or personal medical advocacy. What is most shocking, I guess, is the fact that this totalitarianism is now happening in plain sight with no effort to conceal motive, intention, or the complete absence of compassion for those most affected by the greed and lust for power. The effort it will take to reclaim lost freedoms will far exceed the effort to keep from losing it now. Maybe if you are in your twenties this is not something you will worry about, but sooner or later all us will spend a little time on our backs looking at the ceiling tiles of a hospital room. It’s tough to know what to do except to be as informed as possible and stay healthy.
The FDA
We have learned that the past eight of nine directors of the FDA are currently now or have worked for big Pharma. We know now that a significant portion of the FDA’s budget comes big Pharma. We know now that the FDA changed the definition in September 2021 of vaccines from immunize to protect to compensate for the waning efficacy of the COVID vaccines. We know the FDA has blocked the use of off label inexpensive approved drugs for early treatment of COVID. We know in 2020 ICAN network sued the FDA to produce under the Freedom of Information Act the data it examined for 108 days and relied on to give Pfizer the Emergency Use Authorization for the COVID vaccine. The FDA said with “full transparency” and its “ commitment to transparency” it would need until 2096 (75 years) to produce the documents. The court order the FDA to release documents now (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto) . The FDA has consistently backed COVID drugs with problematic data supporting efficacy. See Paxlovid and Remdesivir which are still approved. Note the FDA is well aware the monetary incentive payouts for doctors and hospitals to use these drugs. (See https://yourtruthmaynotbemine.com/blog/pfizer-and-fda-team-up-to-hide-data and https://yourtruthmaynotbemine.com/blog/xh16nbph6mdcpshyq21q2q2x2hsk7z) . And the latest episode 273 entitled Sacrificing Science from the highwire.com shows actual tape of the FDA scientists debating their vote of whether to give vaccines to babies acknowledging that there was little data to support efficacy shows in their own words how flawed this process really is. Immuno bridging is the new buzz phrase justifying decisions when there is little to no supporting data. Its nonsense and pseudo science rationalizations for CYA. Is there any basis upon which a rational American citizen should trust the FDA to protect them.
The CDC
Over the past few years we have watched the CDC flailing about various COVID decisions about masking, locking down. maintaining distance, washing all your food containers, fruits, and vegetables (I did that for ten months). Studies in the past six months have proven much of what the CDC was saying was nonsense and certainly not supported by science. In 2021 the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) requested CDC’s COVID safety data. CDC refused so again ICAN is suing for the data that the CDC is relying on to “protect” us. ICAN will get this data and after the November mid Terms there will be investigations in the House. When FDA and CDC experts advised against these decisions, the agencies cut them out of the decision making process (https://www.wsj.com/articles/dangerous-push-to-give-boosters-to-teens-vacccine-covid-19-omicron-vaxx-requirement-mandate-11640107759) . The CDC and the FDA allow the public to think they are taking a Pfizer fully approved COVID vaccine. But it’s a sham because Pfizer has admitted; “Pfizer received initial FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. These NDCs will not be manufactured. Only NDCs for the subsequently BLA approved tris-sucrose formulation will be produced.” https://pa.childrenshealthdefense.org/news/ghost-shot-pfizer-quietly-admits-it-will-never-manufacture-original-fda-approved-covid-vaccines/. Why in the world would any rational thoughtful individual believe anything these people say?
Medical Journals
Over the past few years I have had more than one discussion with some of my close medical friends, who were trained to turn to the medical journals for guidance and the most current information on procedures and drugs. I fully understand that it is inconceivable to experienced honest thoughtful doctors that these sources of medical information have been compromised. But they have been and the bogus medical information is making many people rich while they harm and sometimes kill the patients. I respect Abramson’s experience and view; however, I think he goes too easy on the government agencies
87% of Clinical Trial Data Hidden from Medical Journals; Fmr FDA Director: Not Our Job to Correct Faulty Drug Data in Articles
In this episode, I sit down with Dr. John Abramson, author of “Overdosed America: The Broken Promise of American Medicine” and “Sickening: How Big Pharma Broke American Health Care and How We Can Repair It,” to discuss the current political climate as it relates to the health care industry.
Dr. Abramson shares his insights gained from over 10 years as an expert medical witness in Big Pharma litigation cases to reveal to us some of the shady practices they use to get their drug products approved by the FDA.
He also speaks on how every aspect of the drug approval process is driven by marketing ploys and financial gain, not science and safety. He reiterates how the FDA is reliant upon funding from Big Pharma to operate and how they are authorizing drugs based on an archaic system of measure. https://www.theepochtimes.com/87-of-clinical-trial-data-hidden-from-medical-journals-fmr-fda-director-not-our-job-to-correct-faulty-drug-data-in-articles_4554223.html
The Hospitals
This reminds me a bit of the well-used saying.. I am from the government and I am here to help you. We have seen constant court cases and horror stories where patients have been deprived of informed consent, separated from loved ones, and forced to accept unwanted ill-advised procedures. The hospital is there to make money and basically you are the vehicle of opportunity. Many doctors now just say… stay out of hospitals. For a country that is supposed to have one of greatest healthcare systems in the world, this is certainly pathetic. Check out the statistics on how we are doing compared to the rest of the world. It’s not good considering how much we are paying per capita. We are spending 17.7% percent of our GDP on healthcare annually. Eleven other wealthy countries are spending an average of just 10.7 percent. Our live expectancy as of 2019 is 68th in the world plummeting from 38th in 2000. (Reference Sickening above) That’s the definition of paying more and getting less. Big Pharma is screwing us and we are bragging how great our health care is. No I don’t trust hospitals.
The Doctors
Our last line of defense is understandably finding themselves between a rock and a very hard place. Doctors have families and small businesses to protect. They know if their patients wind up in the hospital they will be subject to the prescribed protocols of the hospital. The also know in some cases if they even prescribe an off label drug like hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin, they could easily find themselves in front of a medical board fighting for their reputation and livelihood. That’s not easy. I remember listening to a webinar some months ago from a medical ethics expert and he made some interesting points about this dilemma facing doctors. He explained the decision making process existed on three levels. The first level is family and friends… you obviously want to protect them and provide the absolute best advice. The second level was their patients and their well-being. And to the credit of doctors everywhere as a generalization the third level was reputation intertwined with liability and protecting ones’ ability to make a living. Clearly these various levels can potentially dictate different actions and tremendous pressure for the doctor who could find him or herself saying different things to different groups. Or what if you like many people believed one thing but came to understand that you were wrong and maybe gave bad advice? Is it enough to say I was just following protocol?
